23-11-2016, 02:58 PM
This is a fascinating thread.
Wladimir D, I notice that in your first post you noted the hands/languages for each example, but not the subsequent ones.
I would like to ask: is the presence of certain artifacts in any way correlated to the Currier hands? If there are two scribes involved, I wonder if one of them may have been more inclined to sloppy glyphs /creativity than the other.
Also are they in any way correlated to Currier languages A/B? If one "language" contains certain artifacts and the other doesn't, that would possibly be significant.
Wladimir D, I notice that in your first post you noted the hands/languages for each example, but not the subsequent ones.
I would like to ask: is the presence of certain artifacts in any way correlated to the Currier hands? If there are two scribes involved, I wonder if one of them may have been more inclined to sloppy glyphs /creativity than the other.
Also are they in any way correlated to Currier languages A/B? If one "language" contains certain artifacts and the other doesn't, that would possibly be significant.