24-08-2026, 07:39 AM
Hmm, but actually, all this is already well known? it’s just presented slightly differently. The very limited selection of bigrams, the high level of structure. And of course, if you leave out the ‘gallows’, you end up sticking to the basic structures of the familiar families: the ‘e’ family, the ‘aiin’ families, the ‘air’ family, and the ‘or/ar’ and ‘ol/al’ bigrams. In that respect, I’m not quite sure what to make of it yet, or perhaps I’ve missed something (which is always quite possible 
).
).