Here is the ‘solution’ that perfectly describes this striking pattern of column clustering.
The best way to illustrate the extremely high structural complexity of the tokens is to ask: Which and how many glyphs cover 40 per cent of a position within a token?
Here is the table for Voynich:
(as the labels are structured differently, I have only taken tokens from lines that are longer than two words)
Two glyphs are usually sufficient to cover 40 per cent of a position. In some cases, they even cover up to 65 per cent. Also of interest is the ‘e’ at position 3, which on its own accounts for just under 40 per cent.
(In my view, this is incompatible with almost all the solution theories presented here, but I do not wish to name any in particular, and, of course, I’m not allowed to write which one fits perfectly here either...
)
Let’s compare this with other languages:
Latin:
Bavarian / German:
The best way to illustrate the extremely high structural complexity of the tokens is to ask: Which and how many glyphs cover 40 per cent of a position within a token?
Here is the table for Voynich:
(as the labels are structured differently, I have only taken tokens from lines that are longer than two words)
Two glyphs are usually sufficient to cover 40 per cent of a position. In some cases, they even cover up to 65 per cent. Also of interest is the ‘e’ at position 3, which on its own accounts for just under 40 per cent.
(In my view, this is incompatible with almost all the solution theories presented here, but I do not wish to name any in particular, and, of course, I’m not allowed to write which one fits perfectly here either...
)Let’s compare this with other languages:
Latin:
Bavarian / German: