19-08-2026, 10:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-08-2026, 10:29 PM by JustAnotherTheory.)
(19-08-2026, 10:14 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.About 2, wasn't the whole point that the signature had been erased to near-invisibility?
In the 20th century, maybe. But these people allegedly owned the VMS from the 17th century onward.
300 years earlier, why would it be faded at all?
And even if it was a little faded, these were manuscript experts. It would have been trivial for them to remark such a signature.