19-11-2016, 07:46 PM
The text anomalies are very interesting, but really, let's not draw to conclusions from any visual presentation.
I can create visuals for any other letter and picture in the manuscript.
Placing them in a particular order will not suddenly "reveal" how a character has evolved. In particular not if the anomalies are not on the same page.
Nor does it show anything for other characters that resemble the anomalies! There is no founded basis for that.
It does show what could be possible with imagination and a graphic editor, but it certainly does not show any chronological or other logical sequencing for the characters.
I can create visuals for any other letter and picture in the manuscript.
Placing them in a particular order will not suddenly "reveal" how a character has evolved. In particular not if the anomalies are not on the same page.
Nor does it show anything for other characters that resemble the anomalies! There is no founded basis for that.
It does show what could be possible with imagination and a graphic editor, but it certainly does not show any chronological or other logical sequencing for the characters.

