Split: Entropy digression

[eggyk]

The ball is now in your court to double-check that the tool you used properly handled the above-mentioned points.

In cases of differing results to the norm, isn't the normal procedure to prove those results are invalid? It's a little unusual to go down the route of "your figures are wrong, prove to me that they are right". 

Or you can also just believe us.

This isn't productive way to discuss this, imo.

It's entirely possible that the 2 tools you talked about both contain some systemic error, and that the 3rd does not. 2 sets of results is far from a consensus too, but even if it were, consensuses quite often can be wrong. (im not saying this is the case, but it's not impossible that it is the case).