Atoms and elements of the Voynichese alphabet

[Stefan Wirtz_2]

If 'in', 'iin', 'ir', 'iir', then why not 'im', 'iim', 'ig', 'il', 'iil', 'is', 'iis', 'ik', 'iik' etc.?

Maybe, why not?

But the main differences are:
- in and iin appear rather often in VMS; mostly, but not exclusively in an end position. The are following very often some "a", but there are some exceptions also. They never show up stand-alone. 
n is functioning as stand-alone letter in columns and main text. 
So I see in and iin as combined, but as new characters with an own "value", calling it element of the basic VMS alphabet.

- nearly the same for "ii"

- ir and iir are technically combinations of r with i and ii. I wouldn't have considered these as atoms or elements, but since air has a fixed stand-alone meaning and use, I took these as values of their own also into the table; they appear also in main texts sometimes without an "a", but remain as redframed second-class letters in my table.

- why not im, iim, ig, il, iil, is, iis, ik, iik ? 
I understand those strings as combinations; did not see a stand-alone usage yet, and not a very high rate of use within text. (may call those 'molecules', if you want to). Finally, all Vords are combinations of basic alphabetical elements: I tried to concentrate and condense those latter ones here.