Poll: Do you agree with these three statements?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
100.00%
5 100.00%
No
0%
0 0%
Total 5 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Roots of plants in f33r, f89r1, f101v2 include depictions of anthropomorphic heads
#6
I have added the other two "human" head plants I am aware of, as suggested by Koen. Do you think this will make the discussion more difficult?
I think that David's argument applies equally to the three images, but please let me know what you think.

In my opinion, a "divine" head is recognizable from a human head only by means of specific attributes (e.g. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., in some Christian art). By saying they are human, we don't rule out that they can be divine as well. As Anton wrote, there are images of gods in human form. But it's important to find a formulation that does not seem misleading to David. I hope that others will point out other potential problems.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Roots of plants in f33r, f89r1, f101v2 include depictions of human heads - by MarcoP - 11-11-2016, 05:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)