05-06-2026, 04:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-06-2026, 04:40 PM by Labyrinthinesecurity.)
(05-06-2026, 02:44 PM)dashstofsk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Would it be possible for your generator to output its text in IVTFF format? And if it could generate 20 pages and about 7000 words total I would then be better able to compare it with quire 13.
will do next week if I can, thanks!
nablator dateline='[url=tel:1780673871' wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.1780673871[/url]']
dashstofsk dateline='[url=tel:1780667083' wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.1780667083[/url]']
Would it be possible for your generator to output its text in IVTFF format? And if it could generate 20 pages and about 7000 words total I would then be better able to compare it with quire 13.
A direct comparison to Q13 would require a specific training: some glyph trigrams don't exist, Q13 has a lower MATTR than any other section, m are always at the end of lines.
What I'd like to see is how a text, not generated by any kind of "self-citation" algorithm, but closely modeled on the real text, compares to the VMS in terms of local similarity metrics.
interesting,.. which kind of metrics do you have in mind?