The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 4 : The Chunking of Scribes
#4
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I think there are a lot of hand 1 pages in the manuscript, quite a number of hand 2 pages and only a few pages each for the rest of the scribes. The first graph appears to look as if the count of chunks is higher for scribe 5 than scribe 1. How is this possible?

Edit: ok, you said "counted and weighted", now I see, however do these absolute values make any sense after counting and weighting?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 4 : The Chunking of Scribes - by oshfdk - 28-05-2026, 06:56 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" Dunsel 45 13,592 17-03-2026, 05:54 AM
Last Post: Dunsel
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed" Dunsel 18 5,671 20-02-2026, 08:43 PM
Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was. Dunsel 16 5,634 18-02-2026, 06:45 PM
Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)