Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was!
#50
Continuing my investigations:
1) r_cho predicts the Currier language with 96% accuracy across all folios with words: in the image below, on the left hand side, you see that the B folios (orange squares) are very well separated from the A folios (blue dots).
2) r_cho is not primitive: it is driven by r_oe: the ratio of o versus e. In the same image, on the right hand side, you see that the clouds are tilted in the same orientation when we use r_oe (unlike r_cho). But r_oe is less good at predicting the Currier language, the clouds "overlap" more.
3) r_chsh is a secondary variable which seems to distinguish a "subdialect" in currier B: specifically in the recipe section, folios containing tailed stars (in red) are separated from folios containing notail stars (in green). The big green diamond is folio 111v, which is a mix of tail stars and notail ones. Of course the number of star folios is very small and imbalanced, so this must be taken with a piece of salt.

In my opinion, this supports the hypothesis that Voynich is generated using per-folio variables. There are at least two independent  variables: 
1) r_oe, the dominant variable driving the Currier distinction via r_cho 
2) r_chsh, a secondary variable driving the star shapes in the recipe section.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - by Labyrinthinesecurity - 21-05-2026, 02:57 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Line padding, layout, Currier's "groups of letters"... Torsten 37 38,177 16-03-2020, 06:33 AM
Last Post: Wladimir D

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)