06-05-2026, 08:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2026, 08:54 AM by Labyrinthinesecurity.)
I have fixed the <-> parsing problem and rerun the tests: in the Herbal section, which is the most critical for extracting the switch feature, the impact is not statistically significant.
Before:
Herbal folios: 125
Classifiable (>= 5 words): 124
sigma=1 (cho-dom): 92
sigma=0 (che-dom): 32
Mean r_cho (sigma=1): 0.752 +/- 0.134
Mean r_cho (sigma=0): 0.170 +/- 0.095
After:
Herbal folios: 125
Classifiable (>= 5 words): 124
sigma=1 (cho-dom): 92
sigma=0 (che-dom): 32
Mean r_cho (sigma=1): 0.752 +/- 0.134
Mean r_cho (sigma=0): 0.169 +/- 0.087
In You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., you wanna look at the last table called "APPENDIX: HERBAL FOLIO DETAILS" for per folio computations in Herbal section, here are the first few lines (sig 1 means Currier A, sig 0 means Currier B):
==============================================================================
APPENDIX: HERBAL FOLIO DETAIL
==============================================================================
Folio sig n_cho n_che r_cho Conf e/ch d/l Words
----------------------------------------------------------
f1v 1 27 6 0.818 1.000 0.306 0.478 85
f2r 1 18 6 0.750 1.000 0.372 0.559 100
f2v 1 22 5 0.815 1.000 0.321 0.556 56
f3r 1 30 17 0.638 1.000 0.443 0.364 111
f3v 1 22 6 0.786 1.000 0.340 0.419 83
f4r 1 16 3 0.842 1.000 0.258 0.500 63
f4v 1 27 11 0.711 1.000 0.439 0.677 78
f5r 1 14 7 0.667 1.000 0.545 0.750 53
f5v 1 17 4 0.810 1.000 0.269 0.556 43
...
Interestingly, the switchable templates have now more impact on the Currier classification the switch now accounts for 9% of the variance (versus 8% before), and we have 4 more templates, 2 of which are new switchable templates.
chXckhy 0.909 0.237 11 59 0.672 S-switchable
shXcthy 0.900 0.182 10 22 0.718 S-switchable
Before:
Herbal folios: 125
Classifiable (>= 5 words): 124
sigma=1 (cho-dom): 92
sigma=0 (che-dom): 32
Mean r_cho (sigma=1): 0.752 +/- 0.134
Mean r_cho (sigma=0): 0.170 +/- 0.095
After:
Herbal folios: 125
Classifiable (>= 5 words): 124
sigma=1 (cho-dom): 92
sigma=0 (che-dom): 32
Mean r_cho (sigma=1): 0.752 +/- 0.134
Mean r_cho (sigma=0): 0.169 +/- 0.087
In You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., you wanna look at the last table called "APPENDIX: HERBAL FOLIO DETAILS" for per folio computations in Herbal section, here are the first few lines (sig 1 means Currier A, sig 0 means Currier B):
==============================================================================
APPENDIX: HERBAL FOLIO DETAIL
==============================================================================
Folio sig n_cho n_che r_cho Conf e/ch d/l Words
----------------------------------------------------------
f1v 1 27 6 0.818 1.000 0.306 0.478 85
f2r 1 18 6 0.750 1.000 0.372 0.559 100
f2v 1 22 5 0.815 1.000 0.321 0.556 56
f3r 1 30 17 0.638 1.000 0.443 0.364 111
f3v 1 22 6 0.786 1.000 0.340 0.419 83
f4r 1 16 3 0.842 1.000 0.258 0.500 63
f4v 1 27 11 0.711 1.000 0.439 0.677 78
f5r 1 14 7 0.667 1.000 0.545 0.750 53
f5v 1 17 4 0.810 1.000 0.269 0.556 43
...
Interestingly, the switchable templates have now more impact on the Currier classification the switch now accounts for 9% of the variance (versus 8% before), and we have 4 more templates, 2 of which are new switchable templates.
chXckhy 0.909 0.237 11 59 0.672 S-switchable
shXcthy 0.900 0.182 10 22 0.718 S-switchable


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)