Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was!
#37
(05-05-2026, 03:03 PM)Labyrinthinesecurity wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Do you know if these 2 folios are known to be problematic, from a Currier classification perspective?

I don't think so... no obvious problem. But everything is problematic with the criteria that Currier defined himself: -dy, unattached finals, etc. See here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

He didn't even mention the prevalence of the glyph bigram ed.
[+] 1 user says Thank You to nablator for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - by nablator - 05-05-2026, 03:47 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Line padding, layout, Currier's "groups of letters"... Torsten 37 38,177 16-03-2020, 06:33 AM
Last Post: Wladimir D

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)