Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was!
#25
(05-05-2026, 11:59 AM)dashstofsk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I have difficulty understanding this also. You need to remember that most people visiting this forum are unfamiliar with the technical, analytical and statistical jargon that you have used. For their benefit, please, could you state in more simple terms what your conclusion is.

We propose that the Currier languages A and B, which are assigned to each folio of the manuscript, are the consequence of a mechanism dictating which kind of words are permissible and which are not in each folio. Hope this helps?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - by Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026, 12:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Line padding, layout, Currier's "groups of letters"... Torsten 37 38,177 16-03-2020, 06:33 AM
Last Post: Wladimir D

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)