Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was!
#17
(04-05-2026, 09:44 PM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(04-05-2026, 03:09 PM)Labyrinthinesecurity wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Some of you may have seen my earlier work confirming the Currier A/B distinction quantitatively. That paper showed the distinction is real, recoverable without labels, and predictive.

Have you seen You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.?  How would they relate to your analysis?


All the best, --stolfi

Thank you, it's closely related! And even more Nick Pelling's tables Smile
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - by Labyrinthinesecurity - 04-05-2026, 10:10 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Line padding, layout, Currier's "groups of letters"... Torsten 37 38,177 16-03-2020, 06:33 AM
Last Post: Wladimir D

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)