Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was!

[eggyk]

Is there any jargon that you decided not to use? 

I am going to note that this is not an answer to the question, "Where did you get this (wrong) information from?", which I think some people might want the answer to before a lot of energy is sunk into evaluating this analysis

And the information was not only wrong, but presented as "traditionally", as if it was the consensus. Now that it has been pointed out it has been "fixed" (whatever that means), and the question of the source is being deliberately dodged in favour of waiting for the next reveal of results.

A familiar pattern, although one that's been less common here for the last week or two..