I don't understand what exactly templates and mixtures mean here, just wanted to say that given the tendency of the manuscript to mix prefixes and suffixes apparently randomly (I think there was a nice post by @dashstofsk with examples of this, can't find it now), it's expected for some combinations or characters to randomly align to some features with no underlying connection at all, especially if the system has a lot of special rules and exceptions. I'm not saying this is what happens here, but "just so" is not necessarily a bad explanation in many cases.
|
Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| [split] Line padding, layout, Currier's "groups of letters"... | Torsten | 37 | 38,177 |
16-03-2020, 06:33 AM Last Post: Wladimir D |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

