23-04-2026, 01:11 PM
Well, it is your hypothesis. It is for you to provide the evidence for it. As for myself I believe I have already 'solved' the manuscript - it has no solution. I am firmly in the hoax / meaningless text / artificial fabrication camp and have done enough to convince myself of this.
As for character p I believe that there is nothing special about it. I have tried earlier [ You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ] to give some evidence for believing so.
If however you do wish to investigate p further then perhaps you might care to note that in quire 13 there are 182 ( 0.6% ) of these characters of which only 88 come at the start of a word and an even smaller number come at the start of a line. Their distribution across the pages seems to be nicely regular but are probably too small in number to be able to lead to any significant conclusion.
As for character p I believe that there is nothing special about it. I have tried earlier [ You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ] to give some evidence for believing so.
If however you do wish to investigate p further then perhaps you might care to note that in quire 13 there are 182 ( 0.6% ) of these characters of which only 88 come at the start of a word and an even smaller number come at the start of a line. Their distribution across the pages seems to be nicely regular but are probably too small in number to be able to lead to any significant conclusion.