About the construction of lines in the MS

[Jorge_Stolfi]

What I get is that the real line breaks are still much stronger than the new ones in all cases, which is fine.

I expected them to be stronger... but "much"?

But the important part is that the SLA does not come out stronger than the plain TLA. On average it is actually slightly worse.

This is strange.  I thought that the final m was be an important part of the "LAAFU anomalies".  The SLA should create more m at the new line ends, and suppress them at the old ones.  How could it be worse than TLA?

I suppose you are using a neural network to measure the anomalies, so you cannot tell what exactly it is measuring?

All the best, --stolfi