Hello Jorge,
I fully understand and support what you say in your previous post, but I have some points to clarify:
I am not assuming. I am testing. I am not getting into the meaning or how to generate the words. I could.have made the model to simply pick the real Voynich words from a bag of words, but I was checking what happens if it generates new words, in order to test if they are easily constructed (they are not, of course) and if the text features are well explained. I repeat, I am just testing and trying to get the maximum information of what we have (the MS).
Well, I am not in the stage of creating a therory and testing it, I really have no clues. I am in the stage of observation, also part of the scientific method.
I fully understand and support what you say in your previous post, but I have some points to clarify:
(12-04-2026, 08:14 AM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In your case, you are implicitly assuming that the text was generated by some uniform mechanical process, hence that it is "gibberish"
I am not assuming. I am testing. I am not getting into the meaning or how to generate the words. I could.have made the model to simply pick the real Voynich words from a bag of words, but I was checking what happens if it generates new words, in order to test if they are easily constructed (they are not, of course) and if the text features are well explained. I repeat, I am just testing and trying to get the maximum information of what we have (the MS).
(12-04-2026, 08:14 AM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
More generally, collecting statistics with no defined goal is very likely to be a waste of time.
Well, I am not in the stage of creating a therory and testing it, I really have no clues. I am in the stage of observation, also part of the scientific method.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)