(01-04-2026, 01:12 PM)quimqu wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Most direct self-citation models tend to produce too much chaining and identifiable source–target links.
I don't know what you mean by "identifiable". I believed that the frequency of some very unlikely sequential transfer patterns between two lines would almost certainly identify source-target links but then I was disappointed to find a similar frequency in Torsten Timm's generated_text file (see my last post in the other thread).
I should try something else. For example the length of the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) may be better suited than the edit distance to the detection of the sequential transfer pattern between lines, with similarity(line1, line2) = length of LCS(line1, line2) / average(length of line1, length of line2).
Quote:If you agree, I will try to model them and put them in my pipeline. Will let you know!
Sure. Thank you for taking the time to conduct an in-depth analysis!