The claimed Voynich page

[Fabrizio Salani]

Nice work, Bernd. One thing I notice is in the number of dots in the center of the inflorescences. There are always there dots, yet in the degraded copy, it sometimes looks like there are two. The Salani copy also has two with only two dots, in corresponding places.

Now when talking about the direct use of scans, I guess the 2004 ones should be preferred since we know the parchment existed before 2014.

I did just notice that voynichese.com cuts off the root. Was this around already before 2013?

Maybe it can be useful, I found this Japanese site that provides B/W images of (I think) the MS microfilm and they are of good quality (maybe this has already been posted, in which case I apologize for the repetition).

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
   

I used photoshop to enlarge the image published by Kckluge of the microfilm of sheet 14v and with photoshop I enlarged and resized it to 300dpi, the three dots in the flower on the left are visible and only by comparing the image of the left block, the differences are evident in the curvature of the inflorescences.