(31-10-2016, 02:57 PM)ThomasCoon wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Thanks Marco - well, there's definitely room for improvement then!.
I made some changes to the table, but it is still not totally perfect. I definitely don't think this is the full answer, but I've been looking for a way to generalize similar components of vords.
Just an idea - Back to the drawing board then
Thomas, have you considered adding EVA-d to the second-last or third-last column? I think it's worth considering, given the high proportion of vords that end with dy that cannot be accommodated by the d in column 9.
I can't run calculations during the workday to see how this influences the other factors (e.g., to see if another column is necessary or just an addition to an existing column or any number of other ways it may need to be reshuffled to accommodate the d), but a glance-through tells me it increases the percentage that can be generated with the chart.