31-10-2016, 02:07 PM
Thanks. Although it would be quite easy to check this system, I honestly have to say I applaud to the effort, not to the system itself.
As discussed before, and by others, there is a rather simple Regex formula for the text, which looks quite similar. (as You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.)
I did not test that formula either, yet, but I strongly suspect it does not hold for all the words.
At the moment two other classifications methods that identify >98% of the text, have been described by me, but that is only 1/3 of the work.
I assume/guess this ThomasCoon of Regex method will be satisfactory for something like 75% of the total text. But then what ?
Then we need to find some sort of primary system, device or method which is used as a basis of that method.
I am interested in that primary system, and possibilities to create that.
For your method presented, are there connections, logical cohesion:
As discussed before, and by others, there is a rather simple Regex formula for the text, which looks quite similar. (as You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.)
I did not test that formula either, yet, but I strongly suspect it does not hold for all the words.
At the moment two other classifications methods that identify >98% of the text, have been described by me, but that is only 1/3 of the work.
I assume/guess this ThomasCoon of Regex method will be satisfactory for something like 75% of the total text. But then what ?
Then we need to find some sort of primary system, device or method which is used as a basis of that method.
I am interested in that primary system, and possibilities to create that.
For your method presented, are there connections, logical cohesion:
- between the letters itself in the system
- the position of the letters
- the distance of the letters in the Latin Alphabet (why is this often 4, for the first two letters?)


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)