Can we go further?

[ThomasCoon]

It does not seem that we can squeeze much more information out of the Voynich text, assuming it is a text at all.

I am convinced that if no human has been able to solve the Voynich, we will not be able to do it with the help of artificial intelligence either, since in the end it only repeats what humans have already done before.

Do you think that, from the perspective of text analysis, it is still possible to go further?

After years of looking at Voynich text and probabilities, I also have no idea whether the text is meaningful or not.

But if it DOES have meaning, my guess is that it comes from a cipher system which will be very difficult to disentangle, because multiple bigrams or trigrams may have the same values. For example: 

• Maybe "che" means the same thing as "ch" - but not "chee"
  
• Maybe "dar" means the same thing as "dain" - but not "ar"
  

Or maybe the text is just meaningless. I don't know.