The claimed Voynich page

[Fabrizio Salani]

Based on my analysis, the Fabrizio's parchment of  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. exibits a higher degree of textual fidelity, than the Bynacke copy.

My first impression (I won't discuss various translations because I'm not an expert in them) was and is that whoever copied it assumed that some glyphs were letters of the traditional alphabet and wrote them that way. I'll give an example of some of the more obvious characters. Whoever copied it was certain it was a language unknown to him but existing and similar in character to the Western script of the time (which time?). An expert forensic graphologist told me that "it's immediately obvious that whoever created it had considerable difficulty writing the text compared to the drawing, because the curved lines of the more elaborate letters (?) are more uncertain and shaky compared to the curved lines of the drawing, which are clean and without imprecision. This means that (the expert was unaware of the existence of the Voynich manuscript, and I didn't mention the manuscript or even that it was a copy) it's a work from which he had to constantly look away in the text, while in the drawing he was more comfortable with his gaze on what he was doing rather than elsewhere." I think this means that he hadn't "practiced" the copy by doing any tests beforehand, but this is just my hindsight conclusion.