[Blog Post] Some conclusions drawn from twelve years of studying the Voynich manuscript.

[Wladimir D]

I believe language B is completely nonsense. I still have hope that language A can be deciphered, and perhaps even linked to the images.
As for the author (the initiator of the idea), I don't have a specific person. But it must have been someone who had access to a large archive of manuscripts.

Because there are indications that some bifolios were previously twice (three?) as large vertically. Something similar to the dimensions of a ROS sheet. And when these tall sheets are cut horizontally, we see the tips of the drawings at the bottom in the scans.
   
When dividing bifolios 27-30 horizontally, it was necessary to remove some of the roots of all the drawings so that no significant remnants of the lower tier drawings remained.

It appears that there are also remnants of a drawing on 22v in the lower left corner. This is on the same bifolio as 19v.
For information on trimming sheets, see my blog. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
 
If Diana believes the Zodiacs were previously in scroll form (see her blog comment), then I believe that foldouts 88-89 and Q19 were also stored in scrolls, and when dividing them into their current foldouts, they had to be cut directly along the drawings. I've given examples in the blog.