The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed"
#19
(19-02-2026, 01:10 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Edit to add: I cannot understand why the study of glyphs is being discouraged. The manuscript is made of glyphs. Study them and you may understand it better.

See my reply to Rene.  Statistics of glyphs and digraphs is definitely the first thing one should do when faced with a new cipher or "cipher". But they cannot tell much.  To make real advances one must make some non-trivial hypotheses about the plaintext and/or the encoding, and then devise statistical tests that could confirm or refute them.

All the best, --stolfi
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed" - by Jorge_Stolfi - 20-02-2026, 08:43 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 4 : The Chunking of Scribes Dunsel 13 3,390 29-05-2026, 06:27 PM
Last Post: Dunsel
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" Dunsel 45 13,624 17-03-2026, 05:54 AM
Last Post: Dunsel
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was. Dunsel 16 5,648 18-02-2026, 06:45 PM
Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: