The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed"
#12
(19-02-2026, 10:23 PM)Dunsel wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You are correct.  Two random tuples would produce exactly that.  But you forgot the boolean.  That chart is not measuring 2 things, it's measuring 3.  So, taking your same tuple math with a random boolean attached, I get this.

That is not what my chart shows.

But why attach a random boolean? As far as I understand, the boolean in your chart is not random, but some metric that depends on the variables.

Quote:The 0ed half, which included pages where it never occurred or it occurred once in hapax token, and the ed+ "half" where it occurred at least once and was not in a hapax token.

So, it appears this is a simple cutoff filter on one of the variables? What would the random tuples chart show if the background color was selected as A < 5, for example?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed" - by oshfdk - 19-02-2026, 10:37 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 4 : The Chunking of Scribes Dunsel 13 3,393 29-05-2026, 06:27 PM
Last Post: Dunsel
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" Dunsel 45 13,707 17-03-2026, 05:54 AM
Last Post: Dunsel
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was. Dunsel 16 5,659 18-02-2026, 06:45 PM
Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)