The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed"
#11
(19-02-2026, 01:10 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So shedy eats shol?

Regarding the shuffling of pages, this is understood to have happened afterwards, possibly by someone who did not know everything about the MS. Accidentally bound out of order seems more likely than intentionally shuffled.

Edit to add: I cannot understand why the study of glyphs is being discouraged. The manuscript is made of glyphs. Study them and you may understand it better.

From what I've heard, yes, folios are out of order and Lisa Fagan Davis is working on that.  I have not seen anyone produce evidence of shuffling as a result of the rebinding.  At the top of each page is a number that was obviously added later.  Again, whether that was to keep track of binding order or not, is anyone's guess.

All I can do is produce the numbers and make a good guess.  My guess, with the other evidence, obfuscation.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed" - by Dunsel - 19-02-2026, 10:33 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 4 : The Chunking of Scribes Dunsel 13 3,393 29-05-2026, 06:27 PM
Last Post: Dunsel
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" Dunsel 45 13,709 17-03-2026, 05:54 AM
Last Post: Dunsel
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was. Dunsel 16 5,659 18-02-2026, 06:45 PM
Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)