19-02-2026, 11:41 AM
(19-02-2026, 11:29 AM)Rafal wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Quote:From the natural languages analyzed in this work, only Ambrosius Medionalensis In Psalmum David CXVIII Expositio has similar behaviour
I guess that's the real pain
If none real text had this behaviour then we could think it describes some disctinction between natural and constructed text.
But as some 100% natural text has this behavior then is it really indicative of anything ???
Well, Ambrosius Medionalensis In Psalmum David CXVIII Expositio is a theological commentary, written in a highly structured and repetitive style. They are comments about a psalm that it is also very repetitive. The texts is written with parallel constructions, recurring formulas, and a very stable, repeated vocabulary. When a text is already internally redundant in this way, a big part of its character-level structure may come from repeated lexical patterns rather than from the global order of words. So maybe this is why shuffling the words removes relatively little additional information at the character level.