The Voynich Ninja › Voynich Research › Analysis of the text v
The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was.

The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was.
Jorge_Stolfi Online
Annoying skeptic
*****
Posts: 2,821Threads: 28
Member details
Posts: 2,821
Threads: 28
Thanks Received: 915 in 641 posts
Thanks Given: 930
Joined: May 2025
Reputation: 0
Location: Campinas (SP), Brazil
Country: Brazil
#15
18-02-2026, 01:54 PM
(18-02-2026, 11:50 AM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.One partial transition does not explain everything, the problem is not just "ed", there are many other unexplained statistical gaps and drifts. Maybe many "chol" were replaced by "qol" in language B. Maybe the scribe was suddenly deaf in Q13 to the sound that "eod" makes. Maybe...

But you saw You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. I re-posted yesterday, right?   Would that be one of the "unexplained" things that need explaining?

All the best, --stolfi
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was. - by Jorge_Stolfi - 18-02-2026, 01:54 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 4 : The Chunking of Scribes Dunsel 13 3,393 29-05-2026, 06:27 PM
Last Post: Dunsel
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" Dunsel 45 13,726 17-03-2026, 05:54 AM
Last Post: Dunsel
  The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed" Dunsel 18 5,711 20-02-2026, 08:43 PM
Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)