The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was.
|
The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was.
|
 Member details
Posts: 2,261 Threads: 23 Thanks Received: 1,701 in 1,038 posts Thanks Given: 2499 Joined: Oct 2017 Reputation: 5 Country: 
(17-02-2026, 03:09 PM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm not sure what you mean exactly I mean it's not just one new word with an unusual bigram (like xe in Xerxes) and it's not all words (like a change of spelling): all chey or chdy have not been replaced by chedy in Currier language B. If some of them have been replaced, many remain: it's not a systematic replacement of a short pattern by another short pattern including ed. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 4 : The Chunking of Scribes | Dunsel | 13 | 3,393 |
29-05-2026, 06:27 PM Last Post: Dunsel |
|
| The oddities of the bigram "ed" | Dunsel | 45 | 13,726 |
17-03-2026, 05:54 AM Last Post: Dunsel |
|
| The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed" | Dunsel | 18 | 5,711 |
20-02-2026, 08:43 PM Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi |
|
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)