|
The oddities of the bigram "ed"
|
 Member details
Posts: 962 Threads: 41 Thanks Received: 588 in 360 posts Thanks Given: 70 Joined: Sep 2021 Reputation: 0 Location: Poland
16-02-2026, 12:46 AM
It is easy to explain if we assume that the text is gibberish. One scribe liked to use it while other didnt. And Currier languages correspond with supposed different hands. That would be all.
Meaningful explanation is harder. Writing in another plain language would probably change more text properties, not only this |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 4 : The Chunking of Scribes | Dunsel | 13 | 3,391 |
29-05-2026, 06:27 PM Last Post: Dunsel |
|
| The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 3 : It's not just "ed" | Dunsel | 18 | 5,684 |
20-02-2026, 08:43 PM Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi |
|
| The oddities of the bigram "ed" pt. 2: Same as it ever was. | Dunsel | 16 | 5,652 |
18-02-2026, 06:45 PM Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi |
|
