Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely?

Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely?

MarcoP Offline

Armarius

Posts: 3,016Threads: 94

Member details

Posts: 3,016
Threads: 94
Thanks Received: 3,810 in 1,793 posts
Thanks Given: 4046
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 7
Location: Italy
Country: Italy

#32

10-02-2026, 03:56 PM (This post was last modified: 10-02-2026, 04:00 PM by MarcoP.)

(10-02-2026, 03:37 PM)Grove wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(10-02-2026, 02:09 PM)MarcoP wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(10-02-2026, 12:56 PM)eggyk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Plaintext "m" = iii (or iin at word end)

~100% of 'm' occur after a, and/or are word-final. Natural languages are not like that

This assumes the space equates to a word boundary. Theoretically, couldn’t the spacing and character relationship be a feature of an encryption scheme?

Yes, in that case it is not a simple substitution.

2 users say Thank You to MarcoP for this post

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 09-02-2026, 03:17 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by asteckley - 09-02-2026, 03:43 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 09-02-2026, 03:51 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by asteckley - 09-02-2026, 05:26 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 09-02-2026, 07:16 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Koen G - 09-02-2026, 07:46 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Jorge_Stolfi - 09-02-2026, 09:58 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 09-02-2026, 09:59 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by oshfdk - 09-02-2026, 04:09 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 09-02-2026, 04:26 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by oshfdk - 09-02-2026, 04:41 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 09-02-2026, 04:58 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by oshfdk - 09-02-2026, 11:01 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Stefan Wirtz_2 - 09-02-2026, 04:15 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Rafal - 09-02-2026, 04:51 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 09-02-2026, 05:03 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by nablator - 09-02-2026, 10:09 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by ReneZ - 10-02-2026, 02:17 AM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 10-02-2026, 08:39 AM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Koen G - 10-02-2026, 07:51 AM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by RadioFM - 10-02-2026, 08:08 AM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by ReneZ - 10-02-2026, 10:45 AM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 10-02-2026, 12:56 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by oshfdk - 10-02-2026, 01:21 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by MarcoP - 10-02-2026, 02:09 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Grove - 10-02-2026, 03:37 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by MarcoP - 10-02-2026, 03:56 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 10-02-2026, 06:47 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by MarcoP - 10-02-2026, 07:28 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by asteckley - 10-02-2026, 07:32 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 10-02-2026, 08:05 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by oshfdk - 10-02-2026, 08:47 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Koen G - 10-02-2026, 01:19 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 10-02-2026, 01:43 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Jorge_Stolfi - 10-02-2026, 03:13 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by MarcoP - 10-02-2026, 03:20 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by ReneZ - 11-02-2026, 02:20 AM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Jorge_Stolfi - 11-02-2026, 08:57 AM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by nablator - 10-02-2026, 03:44 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Jorge_Stolfi - 10-02-2026, 07:08 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Koen G - 10-02-2026, 07:52 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Koen G - 10-02-2026, 08:16 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by asteckley - 10-02-2026, 08:39 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by eggyk - 10-02-2026, 08:58 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by RadioFM - 10-02-2026, 08:26 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Koen G - 10-02-2026, 09:53 PM

RE: Have we ruled out simple substitution unwisely? - by Aga Tentakulus - 11-02-2026, 09:47 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	A simple substitution experiment	ReneZ	19	10,083	18-09-2025, 10:54 AM Last Post: ReneZ

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread:

Login
Username/Email:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me