(06-02-2026, 11:02 AM)dashstofsk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It and i are the only strokes that repeat. Many words have the format of starting as a e stroke string and continuing as an i stroke string. I mentioned something about this in previous posts [ You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ]. My personal conviction is that it is just a fabrication. An easy way for the writer to construct meaningless text.Or they maybe parts of more complex glyphs. For example, even modern Russian cursive has similar properties:
![[Image: %D0%9B%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B8%D1%88%D1%8C_in_...ursive.jpg]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/%D0%9B%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B8%D1%88%D1%8C_in_russian_cursive.jpg)
A similar medieval example is provided by You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
While I don't agree with Prof. Bax in general, I believe he was right about existence of two distinct glyphs, i and ii, and that the combination iin actually consists of two symbols, not three.