[split] Book of Holy Trinity

[EllieV]

I'm not into the matter and (shame fa' me!) have no idea who is Jennifer Rampling. This should be not treated as any disrespect on my part, but just that's not my field.

But if the issue is that Diane is mistaken and that it was actually Ms Rampling who enjoys priority of some proposal or observation, then surely this can be expressed in a more calm tone. 

Hi Anton,

There is no issue with Ms Rampling. She properly listed her sources in the footnotes of her article. Since my name was mentioned by Rene - I stated I don't pretend in any way to be the first to link the VMs to the Book of Holy Trinity manuscripts.  There were already folks that studied that relationship for years before I knew the VMs existed.

The issue with Diane is that she didn't say "I remember the first time I saw it mentioned" - she said "I remember the first time that 'Holy Trinity' manuscript was introduced into discussion."
It is humanly impossible for her to be sure when the Book of Holy Trinity was first mentioned in relation to the VMs. It's been a 100 years long discussion (in the modern part of the VMs history).

Diane often complains about flaming comments, but she readily provides the sparks to start the fire.