27-10-2016, 08:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 27-10-2016, 08:26 PM by Diane.
Edit Reason: add
)
Ellie
I remember the first time that 'Holy Trinity' manuscript was introduced into discussion. It was mentioned in a fairly speculative comment made to Nick pelling's blog.. amazing to see how that passing speculation, being passed hand to hand, eventually gains a reputation - almost 'orthodoxy'.
For me, an important question raised by such attempted comparisons is too rarely considered or investigated - namely, that such 'comparisons' are always instantly intelligible even to modern eyes where the Voynich manuscript's imagery remains opaque for the most part... Why is that, exactly?
I remember the first time that 'Holy Trinity' manuscript was introduced into discussion. It was mentioned in a fairly speculative comment made to Nick pelling's blog.. amazing to see how that passing speculation, being passed hand to hand, eventually gains a reputation - almost 'orthodoxy'.
For me, an important question raised by such attempted comparisons is too rarely considered or investigated - namely, that such 'comparisons' are always instantly intelligible even to modern eyes where the Voynich manuscript's imagery remains opaque for the most part... Why is that, exactly?


