22-01-2016, 06:10 PM
Thanks for replying!
I think it's great that you've done this, whether or not your deconstruction/translation is the right one I don't know, but I think it really does seem to tick a lot of boxes.
If you ever do get around to writing about 1r I'd love to read that. To me there is something really different about that page, with its big red "weirdos" and some other strange stuff going on too, like the absence of that character that looks like a 4 and seems to appear pretty much everywhere else (or is that just due to what they call language A or B?); but these are just impressions and I have only questions... like you said the Voynich truly is "a mystery that keeps on mystifying"!
I think it's great that you've done this, whether or not your deconstruction/translation is the right one I don't know, but I think it really does seem to tick a lot of boxes.
If you ever do get around to writing about 1r I'd love to read that. To me there is something really different about that page, with its big red "weirdos" and some other strange stuff going on too, like the absence of that character that looks like a 4 and seems to appear pretty much everywhere else (or is that just due to what they call language A or B?); but these are just impressions and I have only questions... like you said the Voynich truly is "a mystery that keeps on mystifying"!

