27-01-2026, 03:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 27-01-2026, 04:00 PM by Jorge_Stolfi.)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. by the University of Namur.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. by Eugenio Monesma
At first sight it may seem that both require an large amount of work. But the same work produces one sheet of vellum, and several hundred sheets of paper...
Paper, like vellum, has large price/weight ratio, and is not perishable. Unlike vellum, even a small a paper mill can produce several hundred sheets per day.
Thus neither paper nor vellum require local manufacture. Both can be imported over large distances. Wasn't the paper of Marci's letter made in Italy?
All the best, --stolfi
Do you have a source for this claim?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. by Eugenio Monesma
At first sight it may seem that both require an large amount of work. But the same work produces one sheet of vellum, and several hundred sheets of paper...
(27-01-2026, 06:16 AM)Aga Tentakulus wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.paper was not available everywhere. Germany, for example, had around 10 paper mills in 1450. The idea that paper was easily available to everyone, especially in rural areas, is an illusion
Paper, like vellum, has large price/weight ratio, and is not perishable. Unlike vellum, even a small a paper mill can produce several hundred sheets per day.
Thus neither paper nor vellum require local manufacture. Both can be imported over large distances. Wasn't the paper of Marci's letter made in Italy?
All the best, --stolfi
(27-01-2026, 01:11 PM)LisaFaginDavis wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Paper may have been available, but yes, in the early fifteenth century it was not yet in common use and would have been more expensive than parchment.
Do you have a source for this claim?

