25-10-2016, 10:46 PM
My objections would be to the wording, again.
First of all, prior to introducing any "section" references to the VMBOK, it would be a good thing to introduce section definitions into there, to begin with.
Is it a "botanical" section or a "herbal" one? Is it "pharmaceutical" or "roots'n'leaves"? And so forth.
So actually I would suggest to suspend the poll and initiate a statement about sections - what are they and how they are commonly called. After harmonizing that, we can return to this statement and re-open the poll.
Second, in paragraph 2 it is not logical to speak of an "exception", for the pharma section is a different section than the botanical section, and paragraph 1) deals with the botanical section exclusively.
First of all, prior to introducing any "section" references to the VMBOK, it would be a good thing to introduce section definitions into there, to begin with.
Is it a "botanical" section or a "herbal" one? Is it "pharmaceutical" or "roots'n'leaves"? And so forth.
So actually I would suggest to suspend the poll and initiate a statement about sections - what are they and how they are commonly called. After harmonizing that, we can return to this statement and re-open the poll.
Second, in paragraph 2 it is not logical to speak of an "exception", for the pharma section is a different section than the botanical section, and paragraph 1) deals with the botanical section exclusively.