25-10-2016, 12:22 PM
Thanks VViews,
Here is a nice article on the matter. According to it, before 16th century the tubes were called semen-conveying ducts - similar to male's. That clears the tubes for me - since they were aware of it - just got their functions wrong. The problem that still remains is the possible "sperm" that was only observed late 17th century - they believed at the time it contains a whole human being that just grows in size during pregnancy.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Here is a nice article on the matter. According to it, before 16th century the tubes were called semen-conveying ducts - similar to male's. That clears the tubes for me - since they were aware of it - just got their functions wrong. The problem that still remains is the possible "sperm" that was only observed late 17th century - they believed at the time it contains a whole human being that just grows in size during pregnancy.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.



![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)