25-10-2016, 12:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 25-10-2016, 12:07 PM by Diane.
Edit Reason: add
)
Thanks Ellie,
A while ago, I wrote to Yale Uni Press, asking for details of the introductory essays and was puzzled that these weren't part of the advance publicity. The omission seemed unusual to me.
Anyway, good to see the list now. Thanks. Also that there's nothing incompatible with (i.e. later than) a fifteenth-century date. Some of the pigments used had by then been used in manuscripts for centuries of course.
A while ago, I wrote to Yale Uni Press, asking for details of the introductory essays and was puzzled that these weren't part of the advance publicity. The omission seemed unusual to me.
Anyway, good to see the list now. Thanks. Also that there's nothing incompatible with (i.e. later than) a fifteenth-century date. Some of the pigments used had by then been used in manuscripts for centuries of course.