25-12-2025, 04:26 PM
This is amazing, and unfortunately quite recognizable.
I understand the negative drive of LLM theories: the training data contains strong anti-simple-substitution evidence, so it steers away from typical theories. But what is the positive drive that often steers it towards harmonics, cycles, phases and sequences? Is it simply providing concepts that are compatible with what is often said about the MS? Like predictability?
I understand the negative drive of LLM theories: the training data contains strong anti-simple-substitution evidence, so it steers away from typical theories. But what is the positive drive that often steers it towards harmonics, cycles, phases and sequences? Is it simply providing concepts that are compatible with what is often said about the MS? Like predictability?

