23-12-2025, 07:43 PM
(14-12-2025, 03:37 PM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(13-12-2025, 02:22 PM)LisaFaginDavis wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In other words, 104v and 115r (conjoint) are more closely related than, say, 104v and 105r (consecutive).
Yes, but there are 4 exceptions in Q20 (4/10 versos are not more closely related to the conjoint recto than to the consecutive recto), not a "very" strong textual correlation across conjoint bifolia. Probably there is a better metric than the one I'm using. And, of course, the result would be different if the bifolios were reordered, so there may be a way to make consecutive pages more closely related.
Comparison of the vocabulary (set of words) of Q20 pages using the RF1b-er transliteration (without '?' words, with all spaces kept, i.e. all '.' and all ','). The % is the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. coefficient.
Apparently this method is even more precise than the Cosine similarity, though my Cosine similarity does find natural groupings in herbal
