Seeking Guidance on How to Publish My Recent and Complete Research on the Voynich

[A.ADAM]

Hi,
your post looks like AI generated content. My 2 cents:

• If your research is AI generated text, it has no value at all.
  
• If you haven't read previous research in the field, your research is also worthless.
  
• If you have read previous formally-published research (e g. the Malta conference papers, or Voynich papers published on Cryptologia) you have good examples of how to write.
  

A recent excellent example of clearly presented research is the Naibbe cipher by Michael Greshko aka Magnesium:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

++++++++++++++++++++++++

Thank you for your reply

I would like to clarify that my research has nothing to do with AI or any technological tools; it is entirely manual. At this stage, AI is not capable of solving this kind of work.
However, I will eventually need someone with IT expertise to help me save time in processing the entire manuscript, as completing it manually is extremely time-consuming.

I have read some of the published research on the subject—though not all of it—and it soon became clear that there was no real benefit in reviewing everything. My findings are fundamentally different from those of previous researchers, and my approach takes an entirely different direction. Perhaps it will be published one day, and then you will see exactly what I mean.

I welcome any advice that may help me share and present my findings appropriately and in a way that respects the points I have outlined