The question of references to internet pages will be handled differently by different publishers.
Papers specifically about the Voynich MS should be judged more from the perspective that there are far more online sources than printed sources, so it is likely to be more acceptable, but this will gradually change.
I've had a few references to my pages in historical papers not related to the Voynich MS, but these are rare, and viewed more critically, again depending on the publisher.
Of course, references to your own work don't really count in more critical reviews. Having only references to your own work is not appreciated.
Papers specifically about the Voynich MS should be judged more from the perspective that there are far more online sources than printed sources, so it is likely to be more acceptable, but this will gradually change.
I've had a few references to my pages in historical papers not related to the Voynich MS, but these are rare, and viewed more critically, again depending on the publisher.
(30-11-2025, 09:51 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think as long as your research isn't only some guy's blog (or your own blog), then it should all be fine.
Of course, references to your own work don't really count in more critical reviews. Having only references to your own work is not appreciated.

