14-10-2016, 05:19 PM
Thank you once again, Marco. You're providing an objective measurement of similarity which is incredibly helpful.
It doesn't surprised me that l and r are classed together. Even though they may not be considered as similar in appearance, I've always thought they worked in similar ways.
I am surprised, however, that a and y are classed together. They tend not to occur in the same places and are not functionally that similar. Do you know why the two algorithms might have done this?
It doesn't surprised me that l and r are classed together. Even though they may not be considered as similar in appearance, I've always thought they worked in similar ways.
I am surprised, however, that a and y are classed together. They tend not to occur in the same places and are not functionally that similar. Do you know why the two algorithms might have done this?


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)