Inside the Voynich Network: graph analysis

[quimqu]

Quimqu, I would have one more question. How your methods treat languages with declension?

Take for example:

Latin: Homo homini lupus est
English: Man is a wolf to man

In English we have "man" word repeated twice. In Latin it is "homo" and "homini".

Do your methods know that "homo" and "homini" are in fact the same word? I guess they don't. They treat it the same as "homo" and "lupus", as totally different words, right?

Would it mean that there are less patterns in languages with declension?

Yes, any difference in words is treated as a different word. It would be good to try to join the declined words (or plurals). I must think how to do it. But the thing is, that we don't know the functions of Voynich's words, so I really don't know if we should do this. Are really qokedy, qokeedy qokeeedy from the same root?