18-11-2025, 01:42 PM
Quimqu, I would have one more question. How your methods treat languages with declension?
Take for example:
Latin: Homo homini lupus est
English: Man is a wolf to man
In English we have "man" word repeated twice. In Latin it is "homo" and "homini".
Do your methods know that "homo" and "homini" are in fact the same word? I guess they don't. They treat it the same as "homo" and "lupus", as totally different words, right?
Would it mean that there are less patterns in languages with declension?
Take for example:
Latin: Homo homini lupus est
English: Man is a wolf to man
In English we have "man" word repeated twice. In Latin it is "homo" and "homini".
Do your methods know that "homo" and "homini" are in fact the same word? I guess they don't. They treat it the same as "homo" and "lupus", as totally different words, right?
Would it mean that there are less patterns in languages with declension?